01
Web application penetration testing
Black-box and gray-box testing of your web app, mapped against the OWASP Top 10 and your own business rules.
Assess · Validate · Report · Remediate · Harden · Monitor
Web Penetration Testing & Cybersecurity Services
We find real vulnerabilities in your web app and APIs, help you fix them, and keep your defenses tight after launch. You get evidence and fixes, not a scanner dump.
Always within written authorization and agreed scope.
The security lifecycle
A full loop, not a one-off report
Six stages. Pick a stage to see what happens in it. Most teams start at Assess; some join later in the loop.
Stage 01 of 06
Assess
We map the attack surface inside the agreed scope: routes, roles, APIs, third-party services and exposed infrastructure.
- Asset and endpoint inventory
- User roles and trust boundaries
- Tool-assisted coverage of known issues
Core services
What we test, fix and set up
Take one service or several. Each engagement starts with a written scope.
02
API security testing
REST and GraphQL APIs tested for broken authorization, data exposure and abuse, the way a client app would call them.
03
Vulnerability assessment and reporting
A clear report your team can act on, then a retest to confirm the fixes work.
04
WAF, CDN and edge protection
Edge controls configured with a suitable provider, e.g. Cloudflare, to filter abuse before it reaches your app.
A WAF complements secure code. It doesn't replace testing.
05
Monitoring and alerting
Security signals collected in one place and sent to the right person, using the tools you already run.
06
Hardening
The configuration work that closes whole classes of issues, and the tests that keep them closed.
Remediation: you choose who fixes it
Two engagement types. We agree which one before testing starts.
We doTest the agreed scope and validate findingsDeliver the report and a prioritized remediation planWalk your team through the findingsRetest the fixes your team ships
Your team doesImplement the fixes in your codebase and infrastructureTell us when fixes are ready for retest
Scanner vs manual pentest
Both are useful. They answer different questions.
A scanner asks "is anything known broken?" A pentest asks "what could someone actually do with this app?"
Automated scan
What it checksKnown vulnerabilities, outdated components and common misconfigurations.
Business logicCan't tell whether a discount, refund or role change should be allowed.
Access controlRarely detects one user reaching another user's data.
False positivesCommon. Someone still has to sort real issues from noise.
OutputA long list of alerts, ranked by generic scores.
Best forFrequent hygiene checks and regression between tests.
Manual penetration test
What it checksHow your app actually behaves, including flaws specific to your product.
Business logicTests whether rules like "only owners can refund" hold up under abuse.
Access controlChecks every role against every sensitive object and action.
False positivesEach finding is reproduced and backed by evidence.
OutputA risk-ranked report with impact and fixes for your app.
Best forBefore launch, after major changes, and when the stakes are high.
We use scanners inside every pentest for coverage, then spend the time on what they miss.
Deliverables
What you get at the end
- Scope documentTargets, environments, roles, limits and dates, signed before testing.
- Findings and risk rankingEach issue with severity, evidence and business impact.
- Remediation planWhat to fix first, how, and who owns it.
- Configuration recommendationsHeaders, WAF, access rules and secrets handling.
- Implementation supportFixes built with your team, if agreed.
- RetestConfirmation that the agreed findings are fixed.
- Monitoring setupLogs, alerts and routing, if in scope.
Illustrative structure
Sample report layout[Application name] security assessment
Critical-
High-
Medium-
Low-
F-XX[Severity]
[Finding title]EvidenceBusiness impact[What this means for users and data]Remediation[Specific fix and owner]Retest[Status after retest]
How an engagement works
Six steps, agreed before we touch anything
- STEP 01
Scoping and written authorization
We agree targets, limits and dates, and you sign the authorization.
- STEP 02
Controlled assessment
Testing runs inside the agreed window, rate limits and exclusions.
- STEP 03
Findings review
A walkthrough of each finding with your team, ranked by risk.
- STEP 04
Remediation plan
Fixes ordered by risk and effort, with clear owners.
- STEP 05
Control implementation
Fixes, hardening and monitoring, by us or your team.
- STEP 06
Retest and follow-up
We confirm the fixes, then agree any follow-up testing.
Who we help
Teams whose app can't afford a bad week
SaaS
Multi-tenant apps where one customer must never see another customer's data.
Fintech
Payment flows, balances and account actions, where a logic flaw costs real money.
E-commerce
Checkout, coupons, customer accounts and admin panels that attract abuse.
Pre-launch startups
A test before launch, so your first users aren't your first testers.
Business-critical apps and APIs
Internal tools and APIs that other systems and teams depend on every day.
Trust and boundaries
The rules we work by, in plain words
- No testing without written authorization from the system owner.
- A defined scope with safe limits: targets, timing, rate limits and excluded actions.
- Production is tested only with documented permission.
- No test can find every vulnerability. We report what we found within the scope and time agreed.
- We don't promise completeness, and we don't call any system "secure" after a test.
- Monitoring scope, and who responds to alerts, is agreed per engagement. We configure monitoring; we don't run a managed SOC.
FAQ
Questions before a security engagement
Manual and tool-assisted testing of your web app within an agreed scope: authentication and sessions, access control such as IDOR and privilege escalation, injection, XSS, SSRF, business logic, file uploads, input validation and rate limits, mapped against the OWASP Top 10. You get a report with evidence and fixes.
A scan runs automated checks for known issues. It's fast and good for regular hygiene. A pentest adds a person who understands your app, chains findings together and tests the logic a scanner can't see, like whether one user can reach another user's data.
Yes, in a remediation engagement. We implement fixes with your team, then retest. In an assessment-only engagement, you get the report and remediation plan, and your team makes the changes.
Yes. We set up WAF rules, rate limiting, bot mitigation, TLS, security headers and origin protection with a suitable provider, e.g. Cloudflare. A WAF complements secure code. It doesn't replace testing.
We configure centralized logging and alerts for security events, auth failures and abuse, and route them to the people who respond. Who watches the alerts and how incidents are handled is agreed per engagement. We don't operate a managed SOC.
Only with documented permission and agreed safe limits. We prefer a staging environment that mirrors production. When production is in scope, we agree timing, rate limits and excluded actions in writing.
In the scoping call we list the domains, apps, APIs, user roles and environments to test, plus what's out of bounds. That becomes the written authorization we both sign before testing starts.
Yes. Retesting the agreed findings is part of the engagement, so you have evidence the fixes work. Further testing after that is agreed separately.
Describe your app, your concerns, your scope.
We reply with a proposed scope, the engagement type that fits and a tailored quote. Nothing gets tested until the authorization is signed.
Don't include credentials or vulnerability details in your first message. We'll set up a secure channel once scope is agreed.
